Portal de Lorca

www.portaldelorca.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The head of the Executive Committee on issues related to the Earthquakes, Antonio Navarro, reported that the cost of demolition and debris removal in some cases be borne by the State, and in other cases the cost is to be borne by those affected.

Especially when the City is responsible

The Deputy Secretary and head of the Local Executive Committee on issues related to the Earthquakes, Antonio Navarro, has clarified that "from the Socialist Party, we understand that it is unacceptable the unfairness that is being committed with neighbors who for fourteen long months, have been on the street because his house was in a situation of "uncertainty" and now, after all this time, if these properties are defined as "technical ruin" are the neighbors which have to bear the costs of demolition and debris removal. "

"Moreover, the information we have is that after many months of waiting, the City Council have been meeting almost systematically records as" financial ruin ", probably because this is the least expensive option for governments. Not taken into account Unlike the cost to the citizen who brings his building is declared technical or economic ruin ruin. This hypothesis is reinforced by the fact that there have been many cases in which after declaring financial ruin, residents have protested and requested a second opinion , and have managed to change the rating to ruin art. And in any case has happened in reverse, "he complained Navarro.

The socialist leader has stated that "we must enact technical ruin when the cost of repairing the building is or may be above the value of reconstruction. Therefore, the building must be demolished and the Consortium or the Administration must take total cost of reconstruction. While economic ruin is decreed when the cost of repair exceeds 55% of the value of reconstruction. With that in these cases, the Consortium or the Administration only take over the cost of repair. Thus, if the neighbors decide to rebuild safer, they will have to take the difference between the cost of repair and reconstruction. "

Navarro Perez continued saying that "we all know, that if these files are enacting demolition which had now established prior to September of 2011, had entered into the costs of emergency and had been assumed by the Central Government. AND anyone is aware that if this has not happened, no fault of the victims, but because of the slowness of the City. Therefore, we understand that it is not fair or logical that neighbors the cost of demolition has been by the State and other neighbors what they have to pay them. "

Antonio Navarro has completed the qualification that "from the Socialist Party encouraged the neighbors who are in this situation if your home has been declared economic ruin and disagree, request a second inspection and even made a private screening for to re-examine your file. If affected of those buildings that are breaking down now, requires that the cost of demolition and debris removal is borne by the Central Government or of the 21 million European Union Solidarity Fund or whatever but not from the neighbors, because it is an unfairness about if you have paid this expense and not others. "

Source: PSOE Lorca