Portal de Lorca
www.portaldelorca.com
Mateos: "Mr. Martínez Carrasco speaks from personal resentment, but above all from the euphoria and enthusiasm of those who know that he has escaped an unfavorable sentence, because he has deliberately concealed the media, and therefore, the Lorca that he himself acknowledged, before the judge, that destroyed the exams of the nearly 800 participants who opted for the places of those selection processes "
The spokesman of the PSOE in the City of Lorca, Diego José Mateos regrets that once again Mr. Martinez Carrasco has appeared to "make a fool of himself" and show the Lorca "his worst, but true face."
"The euphoria of those who have escaped in the time of discount of an unfavorable sentence has led him to insult, slander and lie, something to which we are very accustomed, so we are not surprised."
"I do not know what the Councilor of Limusa can be proud of, when he was released because the judge was not able to enter the fund, due to a defect in the deadline for filing the lawsuit."
The legal services of the PSOE are studying the appeal since the sentence "is not firm", because this criterion of the judge since it is an interpretation, since the law says 30 days without specifying if they are natural or skillful. "" What we want the fund to be clarified because the good functioning of the municipal company and the honor and dignity of the nearly 800 candidates are at stake ".
Mateos has informed that the Commercial Court No. 1 of Murcia has dismissed the claim made against LIMUSA "by a formal criterion".
After admitting the proceeding to proceed, to hold a preliminary hearing and the trial, the judge has finally interpreted that "the claim was filed after the deadline."
Specifically, it is alleged that the period of 30 days to present the claim "were natural and non-working days", so the reason why the sentence "lapses" is because "it was filed out of time".
Therefore, Mateos emphasizes, the Court "has not been able to pronounce on the merits of the matter, which was the request for consultation of the examinations."
"What Mr. Martínez Carrasco has forgotten to say is that he expressly acknowledged in court before the judge handling the case that the examinations were eliminated before the Board of Directors was held, which gives us the reason, and increases the suspicions about the transparency and the cleanliness of the process ".
Mateos insists that "Mr. Martínez Carrasco speaks from personal resentment, but above all from the euphoria and enthusiasm of those who know he has escaped an unfavorable sentence" on the campaign ", because he has deliberately concealed the media , and therefore, to the Lorca that he himself recognized, before the judge, who destroyed the exams of the nearly 800 participants who opted for the places of those selection processes ".
"Rightly," remembers Mateos, "when we went to the offices of Limusa, they never let us see the exams, and rightly, they slipped off the package every time we asked them to show us the files of the selection processes, rightly, their insults , their lies and slander, when what we only wanted was to know how these selection processes had been carried out ".
"They had destroyed all the evidence, which we asked for because it belonged to us, as representatives of the citizenship and as members of the Board of Directors of Limusa."
Regarding the payment of costs, Mateos reiterates that "we will have to wait for the appeal" but, he emphasizes, "that Mr. Martínez Carrasco does not worry that, if I have to put money out of my pocket to defend Lorca, I will do it Do not worry, after more than 15 years of work, as my professional career proves, I would not have to ask for money or help my dad. "
Source: PSOE Lorca
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies