Pedro Sosa, Councilman IU-Greens in the city of Lorca, has given this morning a press conference to denounce the basis of selection for the provision of various jobs in LIMUSA, following numerous complaints of stakeholders who have been rejected this process without even pick them up the instance.
Sosa does not understand how the time candidates have to be unemployed to access the various places can vary so much from one another: for cleaner driver, 6 months of unemployment;
pawn for cleaning, 12;
for ORA driver, 3;
and for both cleaner interiors, 18 months and another 12. This variety of the times, even within the same square, it leads to the suspicion of "possible shenanigans" in hiring.
In addition, according to the council, they undermine the principle of free competition.
Sosa has criticized that due to the precarious labor market, where most contracts are temporary, some candidates have been rejected for having worked a day in Easter, after many years in unemployment, which will request the change of bases of these calls that are supported in turn in a statement that was approved in a Board of Directors of the company in 2010 with the sole vote against IU.
Sosa has also requested in this regard that to avoid suspicion, instances are not collected by LIMUSA, but are presented in the Register of the City with its corresponding entry stamp and are subsequently rejected those that do not meet the conditions, but not the staff of the company in charge of receiving much less rejection.
It has also asked that the processes are not mutually exclusive, but candidates eligible for all seats, as would any normal call.
Therefore, the leftist mayor will contact with the councilman in charge of the branch, Fulgencio Gil, and send a written communication to the Mayor demanding a new publication of the bases rectify these irregularities.
Source: IU-verdes Lorca